WHY WE WON’T BE “TELT”

                                               Image

It was all going so well! There they were, sitting on that double digit lead, ahead in almost every demographic group, basking in the warm glow that the Scottish people were experiencing the ‘uncertainty’ that had been so effectively and strategically placed. It was only a matter of ‘bayoneting the wounded’ and getting down to the bookies to place the bet on just how huge the No win would be. What could possibly go wrong? Well, erm, quite a lot actually.

The complacency that has characterised, the No high command has been truly extraordinary. It’s as if they inhabit a self-constructed cocoon in which they feast on a diet of all the ‘positives’ from a compliant Scottish press and spend all day basking in opinion polls that bear so little relationship with what is actually happening on the ground.

Then something happened. Those opinion polls started to contract a little. Were they just those famous ‘wavy lines’ or was this something more significant? Best to take no chances, get the Howitzer up to the front, just in case. Then BOOM! The ‘three chancellors’ telling the Scottish people that the pound they thought they shared wasn’t theirs. There would be no currency union, and they must mean it, because there was Tory with Liberal and Labour. Let’s unleash Barosso too, just for good measure. And it’s reporting season, so big business will do what it has always done when it comes to constitutional uncertainty. All this together in one grand assault will get us back on track and the Scottish people will fall back into fearful line.

But what’s that? This isn’t supposed to happen! The Scottish people are supposed to feel cowed- not angry and agitated. And those polls, they’re supposed to be widening again not continuing to contract! This Scottish general response is best summed up in David Greig’s fantastic ‘Yes No’ Twitter play, when the No supporting male character says to his Yes supporting female partner ‘it’s better we’re telt’ only to find her, defiantly, responding under her breath ‘I’ll no be telt’. That is how Scotland has felt in the past few weeks. We will not be telt.

The Nos have seriously misjudged the mood of the Scottish people and it is now too late to row it back in and do something different. The positive case has now gone. There will be no substantial ‘more powers’ offer, and they are stuck with a dismal, dreary negative agenda that can only intensify and become even more extraordinary in its attempts to try and scare the Scottish people out of voting for independence.

The thing is that there is a positive case for the union if they just went looking for it. Where it most definitely is not found is in the dysfunctional ‘Better Together’ campaign. If they had agreed even a limited ‘white paper’ on what a No vote would mean, just even to humour the many Scots looking for answers. If they could have put forward a positive, passionate case about the future of their union, instead of sentimentally looking back all the time. And what are they thinking about having all these Tories coming to Scotland for the day to tell us we can’t do stuff with those Westminster ‘analysis papers’? It is an absolute presentational disaster in a nation that still loathes the Tories to the bottom of our ballot boxes.

It doesn’t matter now, the Nos are stuck with their negative campaign and they would just look stupid and panicked if they changed tack. The Nos might still win. They still lead the opinion polls and remain the bookies favourite. But if they do, it will have absolutely nothing do to with the chaotic, insulting, dreadful campaign 

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “WHY WE WON’T BE “TELT”

  1. Pingback: WHY WE WON'T BE "TELT" | Referendum 2...

  2. innerbearsdenurchin

    The bookies’ odds are fixed. At the start of the campaign two very substantial bets were placed on Yes which effectively set the canvas. I asked some friends who were keen punters, one of who is a professional gambler and was told by all that the odds are often fixed. I nevertheless have stuck a few hundred pounds on a YES vote at 9/2 and sixty pounds on YES at over 60%. I placed the initial bets in a Glasgow bookies shop and during the process had a good chat about the Referendum and the odds. I asked him right out if it is possible that the odds had been manipulated and he indicated it was very possible.

    In fact the people who own the big internet betting agencies are themselves ex spreadbetters and all are former currency speculators and hedge fund employees.

    Who has been giving the most money to the No campaign? Who have been paying the high table prices at NO fundraisers in the City. Drill down and out what they really do and I would guess are also donors to the Tory Party.

    Reply
  3. Thomas William Dunlop

    Project Fear is the same technique they used to ward off change in the AV referendum- pin the personality tail to the referendum donkey. In the AV referendum it was Clegg. It worked in that instance because he was rightly very unpopular with the electorate and there was it was easy to conflate his untrustworthiness to the AV vote . In biology we call “conditioning”, the classical example being Pavlov’s dogs, the ringing of a bell (in unison first with food) and the onset of saliva production. They are attempting to do the same with the Scottish referendum with their incessant fixation with personalising independence as Alex Salmond. I do not think it will work becuase, no matter what they think, AS, is no where near as unpopular as Nick Clegg. I think this is the big disconnect is happening in their campaign and why it is not working.

    Reply
  4. george cruden

    aye aye, an interestin’ read tae be sure. ‘n’ yer richt, we’ll no be telt,we’ve been telt for faur ower long noo.Time furra cheenge.We Scots urny ca”ed thrawn because we’re gullible,amenable tae ony auld guff daftys. If fur some bizarre inexplicable reason an outbreak of mass insanity overwhelms the Scottish electorate and a no vote carries the day,I think there’ll be a mass exodus of sane fowk queing up at the airports tae emigrate,tae onyplace.Me? am ower auld,I’ll needty stay here,but then again,it is ma country,it’s a braw place tae be.Miby the sun’ll come oot and we’ll aw wake up on the 19th, tae a bright new dawn.Here’s tae the wans who’ll no be telt. George D. Cruden. Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:34:23 +0000 To: gdcfjr@hotmail.co.uk

    Reply
  5. Mor

    The unionists “campaign” has been the laziest campaign in political history by depending entirely on a compliant media to push their fear and lies, but fewer and fewer Scots are listening anymore.

    Reply
  6. Sneddon

    “The thing is that there is a positive case for the union if they just went looking for it” Stop trying to be reasonable, there is no positive case for the union…unless you are a millionare, tax dodging baw heid. Enjoyed the article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s