HOLD THE FRONT PAGE -the changing face of the Scottish press

Like most politicians in Scotland I have a ‘complicated’ relationship with my press colleagues. I’m always grateful for the coverage I receive but remain anxious about the power they have to make my life an absolute misery. I remember being splashed across the front page of the Sun with the headline ‘What a Twit’ for one of my latest indiscretions on social media and the way the Daily Mail particularly likes to give ‘airtime’ to my particular views is always a ‘delight’. Like nearly every other politician of a nationalist persuasion I have been variously ‘hypocritical’, ‘a barefaced liar’, ‘accused’, ‘shamed’ and other adjectives too numerous to mention. The joys…..


Like most of the media elsewhere the Scottish media is in decline. Sales are precariously down, historic titles teeter on the edge of survival and the media’s influence diminished to a shadow of its almost omnipotent former self. Struggling to find a meaningful place on the new digital platforms Scottish titles wrestle with the new digital place they now find themselves in.

Add to that 24 hours broadcast news outlets means that ‘news’ is so often ‘olds’ for a press that has to be printed for the declining number of the next morning’s customers. In trying to find a space online ‘the press’ encounters stiff competition from the broadcasters, particularly the BBC, who simply crowd them out with their own extensive online presence. Only the biggest newspaper titles with the deepest pockets seem to have carved a meaningful place in the new online news terrain and very few of those are Scottish titles.

The Scottish press therefore has to rely on even more insider ‘exclusives’, creative headlines and ‘scoops’ for its news profile and increasingly comment is king. This then comes up against the ‘democratisation’ of comment with the proliferation of social media. No longer is there the passive consumer, everyone now has access to comment and the opportunity to express an opinion and challenge comment they disagree with.

Traditional journalists working in this diminished environment try their hardest to promote a meaningful role for themselves. They come to the party, though, with a historic and cultural baggage that finds the new ‘engagement’ difficult and problematic. Unused to having their views challenged many traditional journalists retreat into a self affirming huddle hitting out dismissively at a more demanding and critical readership. Increasingly our press colleagues feel that they should not be challenged at all if we happen to disagree with their particular and loaded perspective.

But here in Scotland we have practically recreated a new environment for news and things have almost been revolutionised here. The referendum changed things dramatically and Scotland is possibly several steps ahead and further evolved than most other nations in embracing new media. Identifying that almost none of the traditional press supported Scottish independence the Yes campaign simply created its own. This was done organically, and importantly online, and the sheer range of these new sites became one of the most interesting features of the referendum campaign. Those sites satisfied an increased desire for a different type of news and they offered a perspective simply unavailable in the traditional press, overwhelmingly hostile to the independence cause. It could be said that the traditional press gave birth to this new on line engagement by denying a large swathe of public opinion an editorial place in its structures.


What we therefore have is an evolving, exciting, almost anarchic space for comment with more people actively engaging in political debate than ever before. The traditional press now lives cheek by jowl with new media in full view of a online public with an almost insatiable appetite to be informed and engaged.

But a ‘press’ remains an absolute essential and I would go to the ditch to protect the right of a free press to print whatever it wants. The idea of a free press is the very cornerstone of democracy but it is also right that the press is challenged. Most of the traditional press is owned by powerful individuals or institutions with a particular world view which they believe is in need of promoting. Journalists and broadcasters are also increasingly ‘commentators’ actively involved in our political debate promoting their own particular strong personal views that just cry out to be examined. They can not expect to be exempt from challenge when they have such a privileged position in the debate about our nation.

The traditional press in Scotland will continue to decline unless it can face up to the new realities of the place it finds itself in. It can wish things were the way they used to be, it can even wish the Scottish consumer was a bit more grateful and satisfied with what it has to offer. But we will not be going back to the old days and the Scottish press has to get used to that fact.

7 thoughts on “HOLD THE FRONT PAGE -the changing face of the Scottish press

  1. Pingback: HOLD THE FRONT PAGE -the changing face of the S...

  2. kendomacaroonbar

    Pete, iScot Magazine is a grass roots publication that needs supporting. Not every body who has a vote accesses their news online, nor do they have an appetite for politics front and centre 24/7 There will always be a place for print media, publishers just need to adapt. As for iScot?- just following them on twitter would be a start? 🙂 @iscotnews

  3. Harry Alffa (@HarryAlffa)

    Even in this democratised new space, no one wants to talk about party and government involvement with banks. Bella Caledonia were good enough to republish an article of mine wondering about this, but almost no one wants to know. I still wonder what happened with Christina McKelvie.
    My article “Would you like anything in your Independence?” is here: http://bailoutswindle.com/mairIndependence.html

    Cat Boyd in The National also wrote something questioning the wisdom of inviting London financial institutions into Scotland which also, it seems to me, didn’t get the engagement the questions it raised should.

    So party politicians with huge party support in the electorate can easily escape questioning on banking as MSM is leashed by it, and the independence movement doesn’t want to rock the SNP boat – until independence; when some will want to sink it!

    So it could be a lot worse Pete; if you’re an MSP who sooks up to the banks you’re on the gravy train AND the electorate won’t question you about it.

    Ethics is what we do when no one is looking.

    Saor Alba!

  4. kiltedsplendour

    Thanks Pete. This is what I’ve been saying for ages. I don’t even live in Scotland, but I can clearly see that the press, in particular, doesn’t have the sway that it once had in Scotland. England is a completely different beast and you only have to look at their treatment of Jeremy Corbyn to see it in all it’s horribleness. I’ve lost count of people saying to me that Corbyn is unelectable and yet the only place I know of where they could have picked that nugget up from is from the media. How do they know that he’s unelectable when he’s massively increased membership of the Labour Party and hasn’t been involved in losing an election yet (the Brexit vote aside). Apparently he showed no leadership during the EU referendum, but to my mind he was out there making speeches every day and they just weren’t being reported. Maybe one day the English, and I hate to generalise so much, will realise that the news isn’t necessarily news. Some of it, and a fairly significant chunk at that, is actually just opinion.

    I love the fact that I form my opinions based on widespread reading. I do read the papers, I do watch the TV, I do access MSM online content, but I also regularly read blogs. Whether I agree with them or not it’s best to read as widely as you can. So get a little bit of Guido Fawkes, or Wings, or Toby Young, or Derek Bateman and form your own opinions.

  5. Pingback: HOLD THE FRONT PAGE -the changing face of the Scottish press | Kilted Splendour

  6. Henry McMillan

    Balanced thinking Pete! You successfully walked the line between ‘grateful’ and rebukeful. However if they are reduced to ‘relying on exclusives’ for copy, then they end up as puppets.

  7. Pingback: Now the SNP are in power their skin seems to have thinned | Coffee House

Comments are closed.